Does Rubber Agriculture Development Affects the Rubber Crop Production Rate in Malaysia?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56225/ijassh.v1i1.38Keywords:
output, labor, agriculture, rubber, crop production rateAbstract
Productivity is an ability to produce an output from a given set of inputs. Indirectly generated productivity will reflect efficiency and effectiveness in the use of resources such as technology, labor and others. Therefore, the objective of this study is to examine the long -term relationship and short -term relationship between the products of the rubber agriculture sector affect the income of Malaysia. Next, is to study the cause and effect relationship in the study variables. Several components have been identified in this study such as natural rubber production in Malaysia (TP), national income (GDP), investment (INV), and labor productivity (LF). This study examines the relationship between the extent to which the output of the rubber agriculture sector affects the income of Malaysia for the years 1990 to 2014. The data of this study was obtained from the Department of Statistics Malaysia, World Bank, and the Department of Labor Malaysia. The analyzes used to analyze these variables are the root unit method, Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) and Granger Causality method. The results of this study found that there is a positive relationship between the variables that can increase the output of the rubber agriculture sector. To increase the output of the rubber agriculture sector, various things need to be done. Besides, in improving technology related to rubber agriculture as well as open more job opportunities for the youth. At the same time, training schemes and capital incentives from the government are also able to encourage entrepreneurs to thrive in this sector.
References
Abdullah, M. F., Sieng, L. W., Sulaiman, N., & Abd Rahim, M. H. I. (2020). Measuring inefficiency in the rubber manufacturing industry. International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting, 28(1), 79–96.
Chaudhuri, S., & Banerjee, D. (2010). FDI in agricultural land, welfare and unemployment in a developing economy. Research in Economics, 64(4), 229–239.
De Janvry, A., & Sadoulet, E. (2009). Agriculture for development: lessons from the world development report 2008. Agriculture for Development, 1000–1016.
Deininger, K., & Byerlee, D. (2012). The rise of large farms in land abundant countries: do they have a future? World Development, 40(4), 701–714.
Gale, F. (1997). Direct farm marketing as a rural development tool. Rural America/Rural Development Perspectives, 12(2221-2019–2615), 19–25.
Hammond, J., van Wijk, M. T., Smajgl, A., Ward, J., Pagella, T., Xu, J., Su, Y., Yi, Z., & Harrison, R. D. (2017). Farm types and farmer motivations to adapt: Implications for design of sustainable agricultural interventions in the rubber plantations of South West China. Agricultural Systems, 154, 1–12.
Hanipah, N. H. M., Sulaiman, N., & Poo, B. T. (2012). Guna Tenaga dan Produktiviti Buruh dalam Sektor Pembuatan di Malaysia [Energy Use and Labor Productivity in the Manufacturing Sector in Malaysia]. Prosiding Persidangan Kebangsaan Ekonomi Malaysia Ke VII, 943.
Johari, M. A., Cooke, F. M., & Lyndon, N. (2016). Faktor-Faktor Sosial yang mempengaruhi Produktiviti Penanaman Padi Petani. Kajian Kes di Kampung Peladang, Mukim Kayang, Perlis [Social Factors that affect Farmers’ Rice Cultivation Productivity. A Case Study in Kampung Peladang, Mukim Kayang, Perlis]. E-Bangi, 11, 1–20.
Jongwanich, J. (2020). Export diversification, margins and economic growth at industrial level: Evidence from Thailand. The World Economy, 43(10), 2674–2722.
Leavy, J., & Hossain, N. (2014). Who wants to farm? Youth aspirations, opportunities and rising food prices. IDS Working Papers, 2014(439), 1–44.
Pradhan, C., & Phuyal, R. K. (2020). Impact of foreign aid on economic growth of Nepal: An empirical evidence. International Journal of Finance and Banking Research, 6(3), 44–50.
Ravallion, M. (2009). Are there lessons for Africa from China’s success against poverty? World Development, 37(2), 303–313.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 by the author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright @2022. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.