A Study of Special Autonomy Policy and Its Effect on Aceh Community Welfare in Indonesia

Safrida Safrida; Rachmatika Lestari; Desi Maulida

doi:10.56225/ijassh.v1i2.43

Authors

Safrida Safrida Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Teuku Umar, Indonesia
Rachmatika Lestari Department of Law, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Teuku Umar, Indonesia
Desi Maulida Department of Communication, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Teuku Umar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56225/ijassh.v1i2.43

Keywords:

policy, special autonomy, community welfare

Abstract

The management of special autonomy funds in Lhokseumawe City has not worked well, all market infrastructure development that uses the autonomy fund cannot prosper the community, and infrastructure development until now is still abandoned and cannot be used for community needs. The purpose of this study is to investigate the policy of the Lhokseumawe City government in the management of Aceh special autonomy funds. Also, to identify the management of Aceh's special autonomy funds in the field of market infrastructure is on target or not. This research uses a qualitative approach with descriptive research type analysis. The results showed that the policy of the Lhokseumawe City government in the management of market infrastructure through special autonomy funds included actors involved in the process of preparing special autonomy budgets, namely Badan Perencana Pembangunan Daerah (BAPPEDA) and also Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Kab/Kota (DPRK), while the actors involved in market development that is Dinas Perindustrian Perdagangan dan Koperasi (DISPERINDAGKOP), and Satuan Polisi Pamong Praja (SATPOL PP). In conclusion, this study indicated that Lhokseumawe city government policy in the process of preparing the autonomy budget did not involve street vendors and the surrounding community as direct stakeholders. Market development planning programs are carried out in a "top-down" manner so that the impact on the resulting program is not appropriate to the needs and cannot be felt directly by the community. The development of market infrastructure using special autonomy funds is less felt by the community, this is because planning does not involve the community and is mostly not by the needs of the community, so in the field, the community rejects the help of this market development. The recommendation given in this study is that there must be community involvement in the Musyawarah Rencana Pembangunan (MUSREMBANG).

References

Bappeda Kota Lhokseumawe. (2017). Program Infrastruktur Bersumber Dana Otonomi Khusus Tahun 2012/2015.

Cahyono, H. (2016). Evaluasi Atas Pelaksanaan Otonomi Khusus Aceh: Gagal Menyejahterakan Rakyat Dan Sarat Konflik Internal [Evaluation of the Implementation of Aceh’s Special Autonomy: Failed to Welfare the People and Full of Internal Conflict]. Jurmal Penelitian Politik, 9(2), 1–22.

Faradisi, N. (2015). Determinan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Di Propinsi Aceh. Signifikan: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi, 4(2), 151–172.

Hartati, C. S., Abdullah, S., & Saputra, M. (2016). Pengaruh Penerimaan Dana Otonomi Khusus Dan Tambahan Dana Bagi Hasil Migas Terhadap Belanja Modal Serta Dampaknya Pada Indeks Pembangunan Manusia Kabupaten/Kota Di Aceh. Jurnal Administrasi Akuntansi: Program Pascasarjana Unsyiah, 5(2), 12–23.

Kuncoro, M. (2004). Otonomi dan Pembangunan Daerah. Erlangga.

Milles and Habermen. (2004). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Gholia offset.

Pasolong, H. (2012). Metode Penelitian Administrasi Publik. IKAPI.

Pemerintah Pusat. (1946). Undang Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Pemerintah Pusat.

Pemeritah Aceh. (2013). Qanun aceh no 2 tahun 2013 tentang perubahan atas qanun no 2 tahun 2008 tentang tata cara pengalokasian tambahan dana bagi hasil minyak dan gas dan penggunaan dana otonomi khusus. Pemerintah Aceh.

Rasyidin, Muhmammad Hasyem, T. (2015). Desentralisasi Aceh Pasca Reformasi dan MoU Helsinki. Unimal Press.

Serambi Indonesia. (2016). Dana Otsus Belum Mampu Sejahterkan Rakyat.

Suaedi, Faldi dan Wardiyanto, B. (2010). Revitalisasi Administrasi Negara, Reformasi Birokrasi dan E-Government. Graha Ilmu.

Suharyo. (2016). Otonomi Khusus di Papua dan Aceh Sebagai Perwujudan Implementasi Peranan Hukum Dalam Kesejahteraan Masyarakat. Jurnal Rechtsvinding Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 5(3), 323–337.

Tsubouchi, K., & Mori, S. (2021). Pathway of adaptation to community relocation: prospects and limitations of community-centred planning. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 66(December 2021), 1–15.

Ulya, Z. (2014). Refleksi Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) Helsinki Dalam Kaitan Makna Otonomi Khusus Di Aceh [Reflection on the Helsinki Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) in Relation to the Meaning of Special Autonomy in Aceh]. Jurnal Konstitusi, 11(2), 371–392.

Warouw, S., Nangoy, G., & Runtu, T. (2016). Analisis Penggunaan Dana Otonomi Khusus Pada Pemerintah Kota Sorong Di Provinsi Papua Barat [Analysis of the Use of Special Autonomy Funds in the Sorong City Government in West Papua Province]. Jurnal Berkala Ilmiah Efisiensi, 16(1), 627–637.