Applying the Multiple-Attribute Decision Making - Simple Additive Weighting to determine the Most Popular Internet Provider among Students
https://doi.org/10.56225/ijassh.v1i4.98
Keywords:
internet provider, internet access, multiple-attribute decision making, simple additive weighting, Griya MartubungAbstract
The rapid development of information technology makes internet access an important requirement in many aspects. The COVID-19 pandemic has also become the basis for the increasing use of internet access, especially in the education sector. Restrictions activities outside the house, causing the productivity of students to decline. Therefore, in order to remain active and productive, students are required to follow an online learning system. This will make the use of internet quota even greater. The number of cellular providers that provide internet services sometimes makes users confused in determining which provider is better to use. In this study, the Multiple-Attribute Decision Making (MADM) - Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) methods used to identify the decision support system in determining the type of cellular provider that is the most popular among students, especially in the Griya Martubung Area. This decision support system can certainly meet the needs of internet quotas and budgets. The results show that the most popular providers are Three, followed by Telkomsel, XL Axiata, Smartfren and Indosat.
Downloads
References
Afifah, N. (2012). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Beasiswa Magang Menggunakan Metode SAW (Simple Additive Weighting). Jurnal Informatika - Madura: Universitas Trunojoyo, 8(1), 48–53. https://doi.org/10.30591/smartcomp.v8i1.1318
Alinezhad, A., & Khalili, J. (2019). New methods and applications in multiple attribute decision making (MADM) (Vol. 277). Springer.
Alsoud, A. R., & Harasis, A. A. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on student’s e-learning experience in Jordan. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16(5), 1404–1414. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16050079
Azlan, C. A., Wong, J. H. D., Tan, L. K., Huri, M. S. N. A. D., Ung, N. M., Pallath, V., Tan, C. P. L., Yeong, C. H., & Ng, K. H. (2020). Teaching and learning of postgraduate medical physics using Internet-based e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic–A case study from Malaysia. Physica Medica, 80, 10–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.10.002
Büyüközkan, G., Feyzioğlu, O., & Ersoy, M. Ş. (2009). Evaluation of 4PL operating models: A decision making approach based on 2-additive Choquet integral. International Journal of Production Economics, 121(1), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.03.013
Cahyapratama, A., & Sarno, R. (2018). Application of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) methods in singer selection process. 2018 International Conference on Information and Communications Technology, 234–239.
Darmastuti, D. (2013). Implementasi metode simple additive weighting (SAW) dalam sistem informasi lowongan kerja berbasis web untuk rekomendasi pencari kerja terbaik. Jurnal Sistem Dan Teknologi Informasi, 1(2), 114–119.
Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018
Hanaei, S., Takian, A., Majdzadeh, R., Maboloc, C. R., Grossmann, I., Gomes, O., Milosevic, M., Gupta, M., Shamshirsaz, A. A., & Harbi, A. (2022). Emerging standards and the hybrid model for organizing scientific events during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 16(3), 1172–1177. https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2020.406
Haswan, F. (2019). Application of Simple Additive Weighting Method to Determine Outstanding School Principals. Sinkron: Jurnal Dan Penelitian Teknik Informatika, 3(2), 186–192. https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v3i2.10082
Kulikowski, K., Przytuła, S., & Sułkowski, Ł. (2022). E‐learning? Never again! On the unintended consequences of COVID‐19 forced e‐learning on academic teacher motivational job characteristics. Higher Education Quarterly, 76(1), 174–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12314
Kusumadewi, S., Hartati, S., Harjoko, A., & Wardoyo, R. (2006). Fuzzy multi-attribute decision making (Fuzzy MADM). Graha Ilmu.
Mattern, F., & Floerkemeier, C. (2010). From the Internet of Computers to the Internet of Things. In From active data management to event-based systems and more (pp. 242–259). Springer.
Naik, G. L., Deshpande, M., Shivananda, D. C., Ajey, C. P., & Manjunath Patel, G. C. (2021). Online Teaching and Learning of Higher Education in India during COVID-19 Emergency Lockdown. Pedagogical Research, 6(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/9665
Nasab, H. H., & Milani, A. S. (2012). An improvement of quantitative strategic planning matrix using multiple criteria decision making and fuzzy numbers. Applied Soft Computing, 12(8), 2246–2253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2012.03.010
Purba, R., & Sihotang, H. T. (2019). Decision Support Systems Recipient Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) In Durian Kec. Pantai Labu Kab. Deli Serdang with the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Method. Jurnal Mantik, 3(3), 91–98. https://iocscience.org/ejournal/index.php/mantik/index
Putra, D. W. T., & Punggara, A. A. (2018). Comparison analysis of Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and weigthed product (WP) in decision support systems. MATEC Web of Conferences, 215, 1003.
Simamora, R. M. (2020). The Challenges of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: An essay analysis of performing arts education students. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 1(2), 86–103. https://doi.org/10.46627/silet.v1i2.38
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
