Exploring the Impact of Packaging Design on Consumer Purchase Behavior for Northeastern Cereal Agricultural Products

Tu Ling; Khairun Nisa Mustaffa Halabi

doi:10.56225/ijgoia.v3i1.345

Authors

Tu Ling City Graduate School, City University Malaysia, 46100 Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
Khairun Nisa Mustaffa Halabi City Graduate School, City University Malaysia, 46100 Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56225/ijgoia.v3i1.345

Keywords:

Packaging design, Consumer preferences and behavior, Northeastern cereal, Agriculture

Abstract

This study endeavors to unravel the intricate relationship between packaging design and consumer behavior in the context of Northeastern cereal agricultural products. Focusing on the vibrant region of Song Yuan, Jilin, China, the study employs a multi-method approach encompassing fieldwork observations, content analysis, and consumer surveys. The investigation unfolds in three key dimensions: evaluating current packaging designs, understanding consumer perspectives, and gauging the acceptance of alternative designs. The findings reveal four distinct models of packaging design, each resonating differently with consumers. Traditional motifs evoke a sense of authenticity, while modern graphics enhance visual appeal and information communication. Consistency with brand identity instills trust, and informative packaging aids in informed purchase decisions. Additionally, the introduction of alternative designs presents an exciting prospect, especially among younger demographics, signifying a potential shift in consumer preferences. This research contributes a nuanced understanding of the pivotal role packaging design plays in shaping consumer choices for Northeastern cereal agricultural products. It provides actionable insights for businesses seeking to align their packaging strategies with consumer preferences, fostering brand loyalty and enhancing market competitiveness. This study serves as a valuable resource for practitioners, academics, and stakeholders invested in the dynamic interplay between design and consumer behavior.

References

Christensen, A. P., Cardillo, E. R., & Chatterjee, A. (2023). What kind of impacts can artwork have on viewers? Establishing a taxonomy for aesthetic impacts. British Journal of Psychology, 114(2), 335–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12623

Dickson, P. R., & Ginter, J. L. (1987). Market Segmentation, Product Differentiation, and Marketing Strategy. Journal of Marketing, 51(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298705100201

Engelen, A., & Brettel, M. (2011). Assessing cross-cultural marketing theory and research. Journal of Business Research, 64(5), 516–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.04.008

Goodland, R. (1995). The concept of environmental sustainability. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 25(1), 1–24.

Heeks, R. (1999). Information and Communication Technologies, Poverty and Development. SSRN Electronic Journal, 9(5), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3477770

Kotler, P., & Gertner, D. (2007). Country as brand, product and beyond: A place marketing and brand management perspective. In Destination branding (pp. 55–71). Routledge.

Luo, L., van der Voet, E., & Huppes, G. (2010). Biorefining of lignocellulosic feedstock – Technical, economic and environmental considerations. Bioresource Technology, 101(13), 5023–5032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.12.109

Polyakova, K. (2013). Packaging design as a Marketing tool and Desire to purchase. Saimaan ammattikorkeakoulu.

Smith, W. R. (1956). Product Differentiation and Market Segmentation as Alternative Marketing Strategies. Journal of Marketing, 4(3), 1–63. https://doi.org/10.2307/1247695

Suh, E. M. (2007). Downsides of an Overly Context‐Sensitive Self: Implications From the Culture and Subjective Well‐Being Research. Journal of Personality, 75(6), 1321–1343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00477.x