Evaluation of Fundamental Instructional Design Skill: The Quality of PPG Program In-Service Teachers
https://doi.org/10.56225/ijgoia.v1i4.105
Keywords:
fundamental instructional design skill, PPG program, in-service teachers, primary school, secondary school, vocational collegeAbstract
Program Pensiswazahan Guru (PPG) is a targeted degree program catered for those in-service teachers mention above. PPG is conducted using a distance learning mod and the duration is 4 years. In-service teachers will attend the courses during the weekend and only five times face-to-face meetings with the lecturers. However, there is no comprehensive research has been conducted towards PPG students’ mastery skills in fundamental instructional design. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the fundamental instructional design skill level among PPG students and to determine the differences in fundamental instructional design skills among three groups of PPG students (Primary School, Secondary School, and Vocational College). This study employed a tracer study survey as the research design by using a set of questionnaires on the Needham Model-based instructional design skill assessment sheet. A total number of 276 respondents were involved in this study. The collected data will be analysed by using descriptive statistics and the One-Way ANOVA Test. Results show that most of the in-service teachers tend to have high scores in fundamental instructional design skills, namely orientation, idea generation, idea restructuring, application of the idea, and reflection. Vocational college teachers were champions in all four phases of instructional design skills except the reflection phase. The reflection phase was championed by teachers from primary school. Meanwhile, secondary school teachers tend to achieve middle level across all instructional design skills. In conclusion, the PPG programme conducted by the university can enhance the in-service teacher’s instructional design skills.
Downloads
References
An, Y.-J., & Reigeluth, C. (2011). Creating technology-enhanced, learner-centered classrooms: K–12 teachers’ beliefs, perceptions, barriers, and support needs. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 28(2), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2011.10784681
Kasanda, C. D. (1995). Teaching practice at the University of Namibia: Views from student teachers. Zimbabwe Journal of Educational Research, 7(1), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2013.855440
Kiggundu, E., & Nayimuli, S. (2009). Teaching practice: a make or break phase for student teachers. South African Journal of Education, 29(3), 345–358. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v29n3a129
Lee, M. F., Lim, J. S. C., & Lai, C. S. (2020). Assessment of teaching practice competency among in-service teacher degree program (PPG) in Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 12(1), 181–188. https://publisher.uthm.edu.my/ojs/index.php/JTET/article/view/3058
Marais, P., & Meier, C. (2004). Hear our voices: Student teachers’ experiences during practical teaching. Africa Education Review, 1(2), 220–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146620408566281
Nair, S. (2005). Penggunaan model konstruktivisme lima fasa needham dalam pembelajaran sejarah. Malaysian Journal of Educators and Education, 20, 21–41.
Ngidi, D. P., & Sibaya, P. T. (2003). Student teacher anxieties related to practice teaching. South African Journal of Education, 23(1), 18–22. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/saje/article/view/24841
Perry, R. (2013). Teaching Practice for Early Childhood. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203392324
Villegas-Reimers, E. (2003). Teacher professional development: an international review of the literature. International Institute for Educational Planning Paris.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.