A Study of Clean Water Resources Development Policy in Atambua at Belu Regency, Indonesia
https://doi.org/10.56225/jmsc.v3i1.358
Keywords:
Development policy, Clean water resources, Border Area, Atambua, Belu RegencyAbstract
Developing clean water resources is essential for policies addressing populations that lack access to safe potable water. Belu Regency is classified as underdeveloped, partially due to the community's limited capacity to manage existing water resources for basic needs. This study investigates the implementation of clean water resource development policies in the Belu Regency and identifies the supporting and inhibiting factors. Employing a descriptive qualitative methodology, this study involves stakeholders such as government entities, private sector organizations, businesses, and non-governmental organizations. Data collection encompasses library and field research through observations, interviews, and documentation. These findings indicate effective policy implementation; however, the objectives have not been fully achieved. Supporting factors include community and stakeholder participation while inhibiting factors include communication, resource capability, implementers' attitudes, and the bureaucratic structure. The study concluded that single-region management may result in conflicts of interest in water regulation between the residents of the two regions. Consequently, collaboration between the government and stakeholders is necessary, involving an integrated water resource management pattern with participation from the community, religious leaders, and business sector, based on UNDP provisions. This cooperation is feasible because of the strong emotional and cultural ties between the two countries' populations.
Downloads
References
Abidin, S. Z. (2002). Public policy. In Catatan Kuliah Public Policy Untag Surabaya, Jakarta.
Baumgartner, T., & Pahl-Wostl, C. (2013). UN–Water and its role in global water governance. Ecology and Society, 18(3), 1–16.
Brooks, D. B. (2014). Human rights to water in North Africa and the Middle East: What is new and what is not; what is important and what is not. In Water as a Human Right for the Middle East and North Africa (pp. 29–44). Routledge.
Cahn, M. A. (2012). Institutional and noninstitutional actors in the policy process. Public Policy: The Essential Readings, 2, 199–206.
Crook, R. C. (2003). Decentralisation and poverty reduction in Africa: the politics of local-central relations. Public Administration and Development, 23(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.261
Khan, M. S., Meghani, A., Liverani, M., Roychowdhury, I., & Parkhurst, J. (2018). How do external donors influence national health policy processes? Experiences of domestic policy actors in Cambodia and Pakistan. Health Policy and Planning, 33(2), 215–223. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czx145
Larson, N., Wick, H., Hallbeck, S., & Vink, P. (2015). Corporate Ergonomics Programs: Identifying Value through a Company Award Process. IIE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors, 3(1), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/21577323.2014.1001042
Mahlknecht, J., Horst, A., Hernández-Limón, G., & Aravena, R. (2008). Groundwater geochemistry of the Chihuahua City region in the Rio Conchos Basin (northern Mexico) and implications for water resources management. Hydrological Processes, 22(24), 4736–4751. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7084
Mingjiang Deng, Aihua Long, Xu Wang, Xiangquan Li, & Yu Lei. (2012). Water resources issues among the Central Asia countries around the aral sea: conflicts and cooperation. 2012 International Symposium on Geomatics for Integrated Water Resource Management, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1109/GIWRM.2012.6349619
Mirumachi, N. (2011). Review: Privatizing Water: Governance Failure and the World’s Urban Water Crisis. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 29(2), 379–380. https://doi.org/10.1068/c2902rvw
Narayan-Parker, D. (1993). Participatory evaluation: Tools for managing change in water and sanitation (Vol. 207). World Bank Publications.
Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009). A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmental Change, 19(3), 354–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.06.001
Radaelli, C. M. (1995). The role of knowledge in the policy process. Journal of European Public Policy, 2(2), 159–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501769508406981
Rogers, P., & Hall, A. W. (2003). Effective water governance. In Global Water Partnership. Stockholm.
Ruhl, J. B. (2010). Ecosystem services and the clean water act: Strategies for fitting new science into old law. Environmental Law, 40(4), 1381–1399.
Sanlath, C., & Masila, N. M. (2020). Water demand management: What lessons can be learned from Singapore’s water conservation policy. Water Utility Journal, 26(1), 1–8.
Segerfeldt, F. (2005). Water for sale: How business and the market can resolve the world’s water crisis. Cato Institute.
Snellen, W. B., & Schrevel, A. (2004). IWRM: for sustainable use of water 50 years of international experience with the concept of integrated water management. Netherlands Conference on Water for Food and Ecosystems, 2–16.
Stoa, R. (2014). Subsidiarity in principle: Decentralization of water resources management. Utrecht Law Review, 10(2), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.267
Ummah, M., & Kusumah, R. I. (2020). Kajian Teoritis Water Governance Untuk Pengelolaan Air Di Indonesia. JISIPOL| Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 4(1), 29–51.
United Nations Water. (2014). World Water Day. United Nations Water Press.
Verchick, R. R. M. (2003). Toward Normative Rules for Agency Interpretation: Defining Jurisdiction Under the Clean Water Act. Alabama Law Review, 55(1), 1–38.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
