Collaborative Governance on Slum Upgrading in Cultural Heritage Area: A Case Study of Pulau Penyengat, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56225/jmsc.v1i3.138Keywords:
collaborative governance, cultural heritage, Pentahelix, slum upgrading, stakeholder characterizationAbstract
The role of cultural heritage has proven beneficial for the development of cities. The management of cultural heritage areas to improve and restore the city's identity is widely recognized as solid coordination with the upgrading and prevention of slums in effective planning interventions. However, as a country of many heritage cities, Indonesia is concerned with the erosion of cultural heritage due to the uncontrolled rapid development of slums in the cultural heritage area, leading to socio-economic and cultural changes. These conditions required changing the planning and governance systems and mediating new relationships and configurations between different actors through collaborative governance. Yet, guidance on designing collaborative governance for implementing the upgrading slum in a cultural heritage area is limited. This study aims to describe the process of collaborative governance related to upgrading slums in the cultural heritage area for the target location in Pulau Penyengat as a National Cultural Heritage. A qualitative descriptive approach is applied through in-depth interviews and literature study. The data is collected from purposive and snowball sampling of key informants and analyzed by interactive analysis with three components: data reduction, data presentation, and concluding. The results highlighted the involvement of stakeholders from academicians, business, community, government, and media to implement the upgrading slum in the cultural heritage area of Pulau Penyengat. The development applies the Pentahelix concept, classified into primary and secondary stakeholders and modified into key stakeholders.
References
Aina, L. O., & Mabawonku, I. M. (1997). The literature of the information profession in Anglophone Africa: characteristics, trends and future directions. Journal of Information Science, 23(4), 321–326.
Amrial, A., Adrian, A. M., & Muhamad, E. (2017). Penta helix model: A sustainable development solution through the industrial sector. Social and Human Sciences, 152–156.
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.
Cobb, R. W., & Elder, C. D. (1972). Individual orientations in the study of political symbolism. Social Science Quarterly, 53(1), 79–90.
Donahue, J. D., Zeckhauser, R. J., & Breyer, S. (2012). Collaborative Governance. In Collaborative Governance. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400838103
Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011
Hardi, W. (2020). Collaborative Governance Dalam Perspektif Administrasi Publik. 16–141.
Jung, Y., Mazmanian, D., & Tang, S.-Y. (2009). Collaborative Governance in the United States and Korea: Cases in Negotiated Policymaking and Service Delivery. International Review of Public Administration, 13(sup1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2009.10805136
Milbert, I. (2006). Slums, Slum Dwellers and Multilevel Governance. The European Journal of Development Research, 18(2), 299–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/09578810600717222
Muhyi, H. A., Chan, A., Sukoco, I., & Herawaty, T. (2017). The Penta Helix collaboration model in developing centers of flagship industry in Bandung city. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 6(1), 412–417.
Parsons, W. (1997). Keynes and the Quest for a Moral Science. Books.
Purnomo, E. P., Ramdani, R., Setyadiharja, R., & Muzwardi, A. (2018). Collaborative governance dalam tata kelola hutan berbasis masyarakat. Lembaga Penelitian, Publikasi, dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, Universitas
Soemaryani, I. (2016). Pentahelix model to increase tourist visit to bandung and its surrounding areas through human resource development. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 15(3), 249–259.
Werlin, H. (1999). The Slum Upgrading Myth. Urban Studies, 36(9), 1523–1534. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098992908
Wu, X., Ramesh, M., & Howlett, M. (2015). Policy capacity: A conceptual framework for understanding policy competences and capabilities. Policy and Society, 34(3–4), 165–171.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright @2022. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.