A Corpus-based Transitivity Analysis of the Corporate Image Constructed in CEO Statements from the CSR Reports of China Mobile and Vodafone
https://doi.org/10.56225/ijassh.v3i3.339
Keywords:
CEO statements, Transitivity, Corporate image, Corpus-assisted discourse analysisAbstract
This Corporate image plays a crucial role in how a company presents itself to the public, and this study explores its construction through the CEO statements in the corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports of China Mobile and Vodafone. By applying Transitivity analysis from Systemic Functional Grammar (SFG) and examining high-frequency nouns, verbs, and keywords, the research compares the similarities and differences in the corporate images of both companies. As leading players in the telecommunications industry, China Mobile and Vodafone provide a compelling context for this comparison. The findings indicate that both companies tend to use positive terms such as "improve," "support," and "service" to convey responsible and approachable corporate images, focusing on environmental sustainability and societal well-being. However, China Mobile’s CEO statements prominently feature keywords such as "poverty," "alleviation," and "China," signaling the company’s focus on social responsibility and active collaboration. On the other hand, Vodafone’s CEO statements emphasize keywords like "climate," "women," "global," and various country names, highlighting the company's commitment to globalization and the welfare of women and the environment. These discursive strategies likely play a significant role in shaping the companies' corporate images and supporting their broader objectives. This study offers valuable insights into the function of CEO statements in CSR reports and contributes to further research on corporate image.
Downloads
References
Aerts, W., & Yan B. (2017). Rhetorical impression management in the letter to. shareholders and institutional setting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 30(2): 404-432. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-01-2015-1916
Aiezza, M. C. (2015). “We may face the risks”… “risks that could adversely affect our face.” A corpus-assisted discourse analysis of modality markers in CSR reports. Studies in Communication Sciences,15(1): 68-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scoms.2015.03.005
Amernic, J., Craig, R., & Tourish, D. (2010). Measuring and Assessing Tone at. the Top Using Annual Report CEO Letters. Edinburgh: The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland.
Bedford, D., Chalphin, I., Dietz, K., & Phlypo, K. (2022). The Shifting Landscape of Organizational Communication. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.
Barkemeyer, R., Comyns, B., Figge, F., & Napolitano, G. (2014). CEO statements. in sustainability reports: Substantive information or background noise? Accounting Forum. 38(4): 241-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2014.07.002
Bhatia, V. K. (2008). Towards critical genre analysis. Advances in Discourse Studies. 6: 166-177.
Conaway, R. N., & Wardrope, W. J. (2010). Do their words really matter? Thematic analysis of US and Latin American CEO letters. Journal of Business Communication. 47(2): 141-168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943610364523
Eggins, S. (2004) An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics: 2nd edition. London: Pinter.
Fuoli, M. (2018). Building a trustworthy corporate identity: A corpus-based analysis. of stance in annual and corporate social responsibility reports. Applied Linguistics. 39(6): 846-885. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw058
Johansen, T. S., & Nielsen, A. E. (2011). Strategic stakeholder. dialogues: a discursive perspective on relationship building. Corporate Communications: An International Journal. 16(3): 204-217. https://doi.org10.1108/13563281111156871
Grantham, S., & Vieira, E. T. (2018). Exxonmobil’s social responsibility. Messaging-2002-2013 CEO letters. Applied Environmental Education & Communication. 17(3): 266-279. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533015X.2017.1411216
Hyland, K. (1998). Exploring corporate rhetoric: Metadiscourse in the CEO’s letter. Journal of Business Communication. 35(2): 224-244. https://doi.org/10.1177/002194369803500203
Koller, V. (2011). ‘Constructing Professional Identities in Corporate Mission Statements’ in J. Angouri, & M. Marra(ed.) Constructing Identities at Work. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lin, Y. (2020). Communicating bad news in corporate social responsibility. reporting: A genre-based analysis of Chinese companies. Discourse & Communication. 14(1): 22-43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481319876770
Lock, I., & Seele, P. (2016). The credibility of CSR (corporate social. responsibility) reports in Europe. Evidence from a quantitative content analysis in 11 countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 122(3): 186-200.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.060
Marais, M. (2012). CEO rhetorical strategies for corporate social responsibility (CSR). Society and Business Review. 7(3): 223-243. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465681211271314
May, A. Y. C., Hao, G. S., & Carter, S. (2021). Intertwining corporate social. responsibility, employee green behavior, and environmental sustainability: The Mediation Effect of Organizational Trust and Organizational Identity. Economics, Management, and Financial Markets. 16(2): 32-61. https://doi.org/10.22381/emfm16220212
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar: 3rd edition. London: Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation. of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
Ngai, C., & Singh, R. G. (2014). Communication with stakeholders through. corporate web sites: An exploratory study on the CEO messages of major corporations in Greater China. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 28(3): 352-394. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651914524779
Pirson, M., & Malhotra, D. (2011). Foundations of organizational trust: What. matters to different stakeholders? Organization Science. 22(4): 1087-1104. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0581
Priem, R. (2021). An exploratory study on the impact of the COVID-19. confinement on the financial behavior of individual investors. Economics, Management, and Financial Markets. 16(3): 9-40. https://doi.org/10.22381/emfm16320211
Rajandran, K., & Taib, F. (2014). "The representation of CSR in Malaysian CEO. statements: a critical discourse analysis". Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 19(3): 303-317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-02-2013-0011
Rajandran, K. (2019). Multi-semiotic interaction: The CEO and stakeholders in Malaysian CEO Statements. Corporate Communication. 27(2): 392-404.
Saha, R., Cerchione, R., Singh, R., & Dahiya, R. (2020). Effect of ethical leadership and corporate social responsibility on firm performance: A systematic review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 27(2): 409-429.https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1824
Suler, P., Palmer, L., & Bilan, S. (2021). Internet of things sensing networks, digitized mass production, and sustainable organizational performance in cyber-physical system-based smart factories. Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics, 9(2): 42-51. https://doi.org/10.22381/jsme9220214
Wu, X., & Habek, P. (2021). Trends in Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting: The Case of Chinese Listed Companies. Sustainability, 13(15): 8640. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158640
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
