Evaluating the Content Validity: Development of An Instrument for Measuring Functional Building Performance
https://doi.org/10.56225/ijgoia.v2i1.161
Keywords:
content validity, instruments, functional building performance, historic government administrative buildingsAbstract
Managing the selection of relevant criteria for functional building performance is essential for the building management team because it is strongly related with building occupants’ satisfaction and achievement of organizational objectives. In the current state of functional building performance evaluation, previous studies have shown that the criteria vary that depends on the facility types and purpose of conducting performance evaluation. These selection criteria have a direct impact on functional building performance and need to be done in in a systematic way. The content validity of the functional building performance evaluation instrument is essential step in the instrument development. Therefore, this research aims to evaluate the content validity of Functional Building Performance (FBP) evaluation by using Content Validity Index (CVI) and modified Kappa coefficient. In achieving this research aim, a set of questionnaires was developed based on numerous construct items that obtained from previous studies by various authors and researchers. The selected expert panel in the field of historic building management and building performance evaluation such as local municipality, related government agencies, academician and building management team reviewed and rated the instrument to ensure its relevance and representativeness of each item. The final instrument contained 39 items that is valid and considered to be retained and all items will be further tested in next study. The result also shown the S-CVI/ Ave for all items meet the criterion of 0.90.
Downloads
References
Aksah, H., Johar, S., Usman, I. M., & Che Ani, A. I. (2021). Design and Implementation of Content Validity: Instrument Development for Evaluating Functional Building Performance. WSEAS Transactions On Environment and Development, 17, 973–982. https://doi.org/10.37394/232015.2021.17.90
Almanasreh, E., Moles, R., & Chen, T. F. (2019). Evaluation of methods used for estimating content validity. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 15(2), 214–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.03.066
Bajjou, M. S., Chafi, A., & Ennadi, A. (2019). Development of a Conceptual Framework of Lean Construction Principles: An Input–Output Model. Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems, 18(01), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021968671950001X
Gopikrishnan, S., & Topkar, V. M. (2017). Attributes and descriptors for building performance evaluation. HBRC Journal, 13(3), 291–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbrcj.2015.08.004
Gross, D., Fogg, L., Garvey, C., & Julion, W. (2004). Behavior problems in young children: An analysis of cross-informant agreements and disagreements. Research in Nursing & Health, 27(6), 413–425. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20040
Khalil, N., Kamaruzzaman, S. N., & Baharum, M. R. (2015). A Survey on the Performance-Risk Rating Index for Building Performance Assessment in Higher Education Buildings. Jurnal Teknologi, 75(9), 57–63. https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v75.5230
Kovacic, D. (2018). Using the Content Validity Index to Determine Content Validity of an Instrument Assessing Health Care Providers’ General Knowledge of Human Trafficking. Journal of Human Trafficking, 4(4), 327–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322705.2017.1364905
Lavy, S., Garcia, J. A., & Dixit, M. K. (2010). Establishment of KPIs for facility performance measurement: review of literature. Facilities, 28(9/10), 440–464. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632771011057189
Li, P., Froese, T. M., & Brager, G. (2018). Post-occupancy evaluation: State-of-the-art analysis and state-of-the-practice review. Building and Environment, 133, 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.02.024
Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382–386. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017
Masuwai, A. M., & Saad, N. S. (2016). Evaluating the face and content validity of a Teaching and Learning Guiding Principles Instrument (TLGPI): A perspective study of Malaysian teacher educators. Geografia, 12(3), 11–21.
Mat Yasin, M. F., & Egbu, C. O. (2010). Harnessing knowledge management in the process of performance evaluation of facilities in Malaysia: A critical success factor. World Congress 2010.
Mohammad, I. S., Bee Woon, N., Baba, M., Lee Yim Mei, J., Zainol, N. N., & Nazri, A. Q. (2014). Critical Success Factors for Post Occupancy Evaluation of Hospital Building Performance. Jurnal Teknologi, 71(4), 161–166. https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v71.3837
Mohidin, H. H. B., & Ismail, A. S. (2014a). Historical development of administration architecture in Malaysia (15 th -21st century). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 18(1), 012089. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/18/1/012089
Mohidin, H. H. B., & Ismail, A. S. (2014b). Responsive Design Approach in Modern Malaysian Administrative Building. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 153, 330–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.066
Pati, D., Park, C.-S., & Augenbroe, G. (2006). Roles of building performance assessment in stakeholder dialogue in AEC. Automation in Construction, 15(4), 415–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2005.06.009
Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 30(4), 459–467. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20199
Preiser, W. F. E. (1995). Post‐occupancy evaluation: how to make buildings work better. Facilities, 13(11), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632779510097787
Rodrigues, I. B., Adachi, J. D., Beattie, K. A., & MacDermid, J. C. (2017). Development and validation of a new tool to measure the facilitators, barriers and preferences to exercise in people with osteoporosis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 18(540), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1914-5
Samareh Abolhassani, S., Zandifar, A., Ghourchian, N., Amayri, M., Bouguila, N., & Eicker, U. (2022). Improving residential building energy simulations through occupancy data derived from commercial off-the-shelf Wi-Fi sensing technology. Energy and Buildings, 272, 112354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112354
Sharpe, T. (2013). Innovations for Sustainable Building Design and Refurbishment in Scotland. In B. Dimitrijević (Ed.), B. Dimitrijević, Ed. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02478-3
Strelets, K., Perlova, E., Platonova, M., Pankova, A., Romero, M., & Al-Shabab, M. S. (2016). Post Occupancy Evaluation (POE) and Energy Conservation Opportunities (ECOs) Study for Three Facilities in SPbPU in Saint Petersburg. Procedia Engineering, 165, 1568–1578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.895
Takim, R., Samsuddin, N. M., & Nawawi, A. H. (2016). Assessing the Content Validity of Hospital Disaster Resilience Assessment Instrument. Jurnal Teknologi, 78(5–2), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.8485
Zamanzadeh, V., Ghahramanian, A., Rassouli, M., Abbaszadeh, A., Alavi-Majd, H., & Nikanfar, A. (2015). Design and Implementation Content Validity Study: Development of an instrument for measuring Patient-Centered Communication. Journal of Caring Sciences, 4(2), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.15171/jcs.2015.017
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
