New Product Development Framework based on University-Community Engagement: Case Study of Thailand OTOP Development for Elderly Consumer

Authors

  • P. Sensang Thonburi University, Thailand
  • T. Jomvong Thonburi University, Thailand
  • R. Santianotai North Chiang Mai University, Thailand
  • W. Chattinnawat Chiang Mai University, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56225/ijgoia.v1i1.8

Keywords:

New Product, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Product Development, One Tambon One Product (OTOP)

Abstract

This research project is one of the University-community engagement projects to study and initiate One Tambon One Product (OTOP) development in the three provinces of Chiang Mai, Lumphun and Lampang. This collaborative product development led to three new and innovative products for OTOP. This research defined and selected the elderly consumer groups from three northern provinces of Chiang Mai, Lumphun, Lampang. This study uses a survey and focus group discussion to identify the buying attitude of 1,275 elderly consumers toward the OTOP product. The quantitative analysis and the AHP technique were applied to identify the group of OTOP products selected for development. The potential top products were identified from the surveys. Then the value creation technique from local culture was employed to innovate the new products. This research developed a framework consisting of the three strategic stages of development. The cross-collaboration team are the primary enabler. The OTOP cooperative ecosystem was tested and found that this ecosystem can reciprocally benefit all the staff, including help configuring the organisation’s context and its entrepreneurship.

References

Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the value of a brand name. New York: The Free PressAgarwal, MK & VR Rao, 1997. An empirical comparison of consumer-based measures of brand equity. Marketing Letter, 7(3), 237–247.

Battistoni, E., Fronzetti Colladon, A., Scarabotti, L., & Schiraldi, M. M. (2013). Analytic hierarchy process for new product development. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 5(42), 1–8.

Bei, L.-T., & Chiao, Y.-C. (2001). An integrated model for the effects of perceived product, perceived service quality, and perceived price fairness on consumer satisfaction and loyalty. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, 14(1), 125–140.

Bozic, C., & Dunlap, D. (2013). The role of innovation education in student learning, economic development, and university engagement. The Journal of Technology Studies, 39(1/2), 102–111.

Brewster, C., Mayrhofer, W., & Farndale, E. (2018). Handbook of research on comparative human resource management. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Brown, L. (1985). Private sector development in the Thai seed industry (Issue 23). US Agency for International Development.

Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995). Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 343–378.

Denpaiboon, C., & Amatasawatdee, C. (2012). Similarity and difference of one village one product (OVOP) for rural development strategy in Japan and Thailand. Japanese Studies Journal Special Issue: Regional Cooperation for Sustainable Future in Asia (Thammasat, 2012).

Fornell, C., Johnson, M. D., Anderson, E. W., Cha, J., & Bryant, B. E. (1996). The American customer satisfaction index: nature, purpose, and findings. Journal of Marketing, 60(4), 7–18.

Joompha, W., & Pianthong, N. (2018). Development of Durian Chips Product by Apply of Quality Function Deployment. Journal of Science & Technology, 20(3), 204–218.

Kahn, K. B. (2014). Product planning essentials. Routledge.

Kasabov, E. (2016). When an initiative promises more than it delivers: a multi-actor perspective of rural entrepreneurship difficulties and failure in Thailand. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 28(9–10), 681–703.

Lehmann, M., Christensen, P., Thrane, M., & Jørgensen, T. H. (2009). University engagement and regional sustainability initiatives: some Danish experiences. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(12), 1067–1074.

Leonidou, L. C., Katsikeas, C. S., & Samiee, S. (2002). Marketing strategy determinants of export performance: a meta-analysis. Journal of Business Research, 55(1), 51–67.

Natsuda, K., Igusa, K., Wiboonpongse, A., & Thoburn, J. (2012). One Village One Product–rural development strategy in Asia: the case of OTOP in Thailand. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue Canadienne d’études Du Développement, 33(3), 369–385.

Ogunmokun, G., & Ng, S. (2004). Factors influencing export performance in international marketing: A study of Australian firms. International Journal of Management, 21(2), 172.

Palikhe, S., Kim, S., & Kim, J. J. (2019). Critical success factors and dynamic modeling of construction labour productivity. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 17(3), 427–442.

Phanphet, S., Sukprasert, N., Suttipong, R., Wangmai, A., & Chattinnawat, W. (2019). Factor affecting elderly consumer buying attitude on Thailand OTOP product. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 9(1), 942–946.

Phriwanrat, T. (2014). Properties of Rhizophora Charcoal for Product Design. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 8(4), 333–335.

Sawhney, M., Verona, G., & Prandelli, E. (2005). Collaborating to create: The Internet as a platform for customer engagement in product innovation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 19(4), 4–17.

Schilling, M. A., & Hill, C. W. L. (1998). Managing the new product development process: Strategic imperatives. Academy of Management Perspectives, 12(3), 67–81.

Stenning, N., & Miyoshi, K. (2008). Knowledge and networking strategies for community capacity development in Oyama-machi: An archetype of the OVOP movement. Journal of OVOP Policy, 1(6), 5–20.

Suttipong, R., Wangmai, A., Phanphet, S., Reungsri, S., & Chattinnawat, W. (2019). Prioritizing and positioning of Thailandʼs program of OTOP product for elderly using AHP. International Journal of Advanced Engineering and Technology, 9(1), 2110–2116.

Thammasang, S., & Poonikom, K. (2016). The Development of Indicators and Form of Knowledge Management in Production Management Case Study: Agricultural Machine Industry in the Northeast of Thailand. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 11(22), 10912–10922.

Tuamsuk, K., Phabu, T., & Vongprasert, C. (2013). Knowledge management model of community business: Thai OTOP Champions. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(3), 363–378.

Downloads

Published

2022-03-31

How to Cite

Sensang, P., Jomvong, T., Santianotai, R., & Chattinnawat, W. (2022). New Product Development Framework based on University-Community Engagement: Case Study of Thailand OTOP Development for Elderly Consumer. International Journal of Global Optimization and Its Application, 1(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.56225/ijgoia.v1i1.8

Issue

Section

Articles
Abstract viewed = 425 times