Investigating the Quick Response (QR) Code Application in Internal Audit Report: Unqualified Opinion vs Unqualified Without Inspection
https://doi.org/10.56225/jmsc.v3i3.379
Keywords:
Public accountant, Accountant Professional Standards, Internal audit report, Quick Response (QR) codeAbstract
This study examines the implementation of Quick Response (QR) codes in Independent Auditor's Reports (IARs) and explores the discrepancy between "Unqualified Opinion" and "Unqualified Without Inspection." Using a qualitative case study approach, semi-structured interviews were conducted with public accountants in Surabaya, Indonesia. The research reveals that QR codes serve as technological safeguards, enabling rapid verification of IAR authenticity and traceability. While the auditing community strongly supports this innovation, viewing it as a significant advancement in combating forgery, the study highlights that QR codes are not an absolute solution. Their effectiveness ultimately depends on individual practitioners' ethical conduct. The persistence of fraudulent activities despite technological advancements underscores the need for a multifaceted approach combining technological solutions with robust ethical training and professional development programs. The research concludes that QR code implementation must be complemented by ongoing efforts to strengthen the auditing profession's ethical foundation. It emphasizes the importance of continuous monitoring and enforcement by regulatory bodies to ensure compliance and maintain public trust in financial reporting. This study contributes to understanding technological innovations in auditing practices and their implications for professional integrity and accountability.
Downloads
References
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11–39). Springer.
Ajzen, I. (2005). Attitudes, personality and behaviour. McGraw-hill education (UK).
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2000). Attitudes and the attitude-behavior relation: Reasoned and automatic processes. European Review of Social Psychology, 11(1), 1–33.
Al Ghifari, C. (2021). Pengukuran Kepuasan Pengguna Aplikasi Audit Tools And Linked Archive System (Atlas) Dalam Penyusunan Kertas Kerja Audit Dengan Model End User Computing Satisfaction (Eucs). Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FEB, 9(2).
Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., & Beasley, M. S. (2008). Auditing dan jasa Assurance. Erlangga.
Badjuri, A. (2010). Peranan etika akuntan terhadap Pelaksanaan fraud audit. Fokus Ekonomi, 9(3), 24393.
Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2004). Building a good reputation. European Management Journal, 22(6), 704–713.
Caralos, M. A., & Castro, R. (2024). Certified Public Accountants with Multiple Opportunities in Business Landscape: A Multiple Case Study. Journal of Economy and Enterprise Studies, 1(1), 38–63.
Clatworthy, M. A., & Peel, M. J. (2013). The impact of voluntary audit and governance characteristics on accounting errors in private companies. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32(3), 1–25.
Creswell, J. W. (2018). Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches: A crash course in statistics. Sage publications.
Dwi Wijayani, E., & Januarti, I. (2011). Analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi perusahaan di Indonesia melakukan auditor switching. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XIV, 1–25.
Francis, J. R. (2004). What do we know about audit quality? The British Accounting Review, 36(4), 345–368.
Jamane, L. (2020). Implementation of the Auditor-General’s Recommendations in South African State-Owned Enterprises. University of Johannesburg (South Africa).
Karen, K., Yenanda, K., & Evelyn, V. (2022). Analisa pelanggaran kode etik akuntan publik pada PT Garuda Indonesia Tbk. SIBATIK JOURNAL: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan, 2(1), 189–198.
Kartika, R. C. (2020). Persepsi Auditor Eksternal terhadap Penggunaan Cloud Computing di Indonesia: Studi pada KAP Non-Big Four di Jawa Timur. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FEB, 8(2), 1–19.
Kumar, R., & Sharma, V. (2015). Auditing: Principles and practice. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd.
Kurniawan, S. (2013). Pendidikan karakter: konsepsi & implementasinya secara terpadu di lingkungan keluarga, sekolah, perguruan tinggi, & masyarakat (3rd ed.). Ar Ruzz Media.
Mahmudah, N. (2022). Pengaruh Akuntabilitas, Profesionalisme, Kompetensi dan Independensi Auditor terhadap Kualitas Audit (Studi Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di Jawa Tengah) (p. 114). FEB Universitas Semarang.
Miller, H. E. (1962). Mautz and Sharaf," The Philosophy of Auditing"(Book Review). The Accounting Review, 37(3), 599.
Moleong, L. J. (2012). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (30th ed.). Remaja Rosdakarya.
Muis, M. A. (2018). Analisis Pengaruh Etika Profesi, Komitmen Organisasi, Kecerdasan Emosional, Kecerdasaan Spiritual Dan Pengalaman Auditor Terhadap Peningkatan Profesionalisme Auditor Di Jakarta (Studi Kasus Kantor Pusat Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan RI). Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Pasar Modal, 1(1), 31–52.
Mulyadi, M. (2013). Auditing (6th ed.). Salemba Empat.
Nahata, R. (2008). Venture capital reputation and investment performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 90(2), 127–151.
Rouillard, J. (2008). Contextual QR codes. 2008 The Third International Multi-Conference on Computing in the Global Information Technology (Iccgi 2008), 50–55.
Rouillard, J., & Laroussi, M. (2008). PerZoovasive: contextual pervasive QR codes as tool to provide an adaptive learning support. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Soft Computing as Transdisciplinary Science and Technology, 542–548.
Sesari, V. S., Mukoffi, A., Sularsih, H., & Wardhani, F. A. K. (2021). Budaya Organisasi, Komitmen Profesional, Dan Etika Auditor Terhadap Kinerja Auditor. Jurnal Mutiara Akuntansi, 6(2), 201–214.
Sharaf, H. A., & Mautz, R. K. (1960). An operational concept of independence. Journal of Accountancy, 109(4), 49.
Srivastava, R. K., McInish, T. H., Wood, R. A., & Capraro, A. J. (1997). Part IV: How do reputations affect corporate performance?: The value of corporate reputation: Evidence from the equity markets. Corporate Reputation Review, 1, 61–68.
St. Pierre, K., & Anderson, J. A. (1984). An analysis of the factors associated with lawsuits against public accountants. Accounting Review, 242–263.
Tyler, T. R. (2004). Promoting employee policy adherence and rule following in work settings-The value of self-regulatory approaches. Brook. L. Rev., 70, 1287.
Wakil, G. K., Alifiah, M. N., & Tijjani, A. A. (2019). Auditor Independence Threats and Factors Affecting Independence. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8, 917–923.
Wallman, S. M. H. (1996). The future of accounting, part III: Reliability and auditor independence. Accounting Horizons, 10(4), 76–97.
Wawan, A., & Dewi, M. (2010). Teori dan pengukuran pengetahuan, sikap dan perilaku manusia (12th ed.). Nuha Medika.
Wibowo, A. (2015). Pengaruh Kode Etik Akuntan, Personal Ethical Philosophy, Corporate Ethical Value Terhadap Persepsi Etis Dan Pertimbangan Etis Auditor (Studi Empiris pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di Jakarta). Serat Acitya, 3(2), 30–48. https://doi.org/10.56444/sa.v3i2.130
Wolnizer, P. W. (2006). Auditing as independent authentication. Sydney University Press.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Sage.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
