The Effect of Principals’ Reward System on Learners’ Academic Performance in Kenya Certificate of Secondary Education

https://doi.org/10.56225/ijassh.v3i3.300

Authors

  • Thomas Odongo Ololo Department of Curriculum and Educational Management, Jaramogi Oginga Odinga University of Science and Technology, Ukwala-Bondo Rd, Bondo, Kenya
  • Mary Anyango Onditi Department of Curriculum and Educational Management, Jaramogi Oginga Odinga University of Science and Technology, Ukwala-Bondo Rd, Bondo, Kenya
  • Benard Mwebi Department of Curriculum and Educational Management, Jaramogi Oginga Odinga University of Science and Technology, Ukwala-Bondo Rd, Bondo, Kenya

Keywords:

Principals’ leadership practices, Reward system, Academic performance, K.C.S.E, Kenya

Abstract

Rewarding productive teachers signifies recognition by school leadership. This study aimed to determine the influence of principals’ reward systems on learners’ academic performance in K.C.S.E., grounded on Karl Ludwig von Bertalanffy’s General Systems Theory. An explanatory sequential mixed-method design was employed, prioritizing quantitative data in phase one, followed by qualitative data in phase two. The target population included 4,691 participants: 340 principals, 1,360 Heads of Departments (H.O.Ds), and 2,991 teachers, with a sample of 451 respondents. Proportionate stratified random sampling selected 85 schools, 114 H.O.Ds, and 252 teachers, while census sampling chose national and special schools, and 85 principals were purposefully sampled. Data were collected using questionnaires and interview guides. Validity (content, criterion, construct, face) was ensured through expert evaluation, and reliability was confirmed with a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient over 0.7. Quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS Version 29, and qualitative data were analyzed thematically, presented with direct quotes and integrated with phase one findings. Descriptive statistics were shown in tables and graphs, and inferential statistics were presented as Pearson’s correlation coefficients, ANOVA, and regression coefficients. The study found a weak positive insignificant influence between the reward system and learners' academic performance (r=0.021, p≤0.05; 2-tailed), supporting the null hypothesis. Principals’ interviews indicated financial constraints and unclear promotion policies demoralize teachers. The study’s findings aim to guide corrective measures for low academic performance in the study area and recommend further research on the impact of principals' leadership skills on K.C.S.E. performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amir, S., Jared, T., Nauman, M. M., and Iqra, T. (2019). Does a human resource effect of Job satisfaction of teachers? A case study of education institutions in Punjab, Pakistan. International Journal of Contemporary Education, 2(2), 122-129. Doi: 10.1114/ ijce.v 2i2.4515.

Arogundade, B. B. (2019). Staff development and promotion as correlates of teachers’ job satisfaction in secondary schools in Ekiti State, Nigeria. Contemporary Research in Education and English Language Teaching, 1, 41-44. ISSN2641-0230.

Arwa, M. R., Nyakundi, W. A., and Abuga, V. M. (2019). Effects of reward systems on performance of health organizations in Kenya: A case of Aga Khan Hospital- Kisumu. International Journal of Social Science and Information Technology, 5(5), 130-146.

Assibi, J. K. (2019). Teacher motivation and school performance: Evaluation from three selected senior high schools in Prampram district, Ghana. Unpublished M.Ed. Thesis, University of Cape Town.

Berry, J., Kim, H. B., and Son, H. (2019). When students’ incentives don’t work: Evidence from a field experiment in Malawi. JEL Classification: 121:015

Cohen, L., Manion, L., and Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education. (7th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

Comighud, S. M. T., and Arevalo, J. M. (2020). Motivation in relation to teachers’ performance. Journal of Scientific and Research Publication. 10(4), 641-653.

Creswell, J. W., and Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (5thed.). Thousand Oaks, CA Sage Publications.

Greatbatch, D., and Tate, S. (2018). Evidence on school leadership in an international context. Government Social Research, Department of Education, U.K. ISBN: 978-1-78105-903-6

Grissom, J. A., Anna J. E., and Constance A. L. (2021). How Principals Affect Students and Schools: A Systematic Synthesis of Two Decades of Research. New York: The Wallace Foundation. http://www.wallacefoundation.org/principalsynthesis.

Guetterman, T. C., Fetters, M. D., and Creswell, J. W. (2015). Integrating quantitative and qualitative results in health science mixed methods research through joint displays. Annals of Family Medicine, 13, 554-561.

Gyansah, S. M. (2020). Effect of school heads transformational leadership practices on students’ academic achievement in Senior high schools in Kumasi Metropolitan, Ghana. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Kenyatta University.

Hallinger, P., and Murphy, J. (2012). Running on empty? Finding the time and capacity to lead learning: Asia Pacific Centre for Leadership and Change (APCLC) Monograph Series, Number 5, Tai Po, N.T, Hong Kong.

Hanushek, E. A. (2011). The economic value of higher teacher quality: Economics of Education Review, doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.12.006

Leone, T. (2020). Does productivity bonus pay off? The effects of teacher incentive pay on students’ achievement in Brazilian schools, 1-29.

Mendel, P. (2012). The effective principal: Five pivotal practices that shape instructional leadership. Journal of Staff Development, 33(1), 54-58.

Michelmore, K., and Dynarski, S. (2016). The gap within the gap: Using longitudinal data to understand income differences in student achievement, NBER Working Paper No.22474.

Mintrop, R., and Ordenes, M. (2017). Teachers’ work motivation in the era of extrinsic incentives: Performance goals and pro-social commitments in the service of equity. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 25(44), http://dx.doi.org/ 10.14507/epaa. 25.2482

Mugenda, O., and Mugenda, A. (2008). Research methods: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. Nairobi, African centre for technology studies (Acts) Press.

Mugweru, W. (2013). Promotion of secondary school teachers by gender, experience, school type: A case in Kenya. Middle Eastern and African Journal of Educational Research, Issue No. 6, 24-43.

Murphy, J., Elliot, S., Goldring, E., Porter, A., (2007). Leadership for learning: A research-based model taxonomy of behaviours. School leadership and Management, 27(2), 179-201.

Ogola, C. A. (2017). Influence of school Board of Management strategies on students’ performance at K.C.S.E. in Suna West, Migori County, M. Ed., Research Project, University of Nairobi.

Oguta, P. A. (2021). Teacher motivation methods and their impact on students’ academic performance. International Journal of Novel Research in Education and Learning, 8(5), 1-7.

Olson, K. (2010). An examination of questionnaire evaluation by experts. Field methods, 22(4), 503-529.

Republic of Kenya (2015). Teachers Service Commission Code of Regulation for teachers, Nairobi, Kenya.

Republic of Kenya (2019). National Education Sector Strategic Plan 2018-2022: Kenya Vision 2030, Nairobi.

Republic of Kenya (2018). Teachers Service Commission Career Progression Guideline, Nairobi, Kenya.

Roth, S. (2019). The open theory and its enemy: Implicit moralization as epistemological obstacles for general systems theory. Systems Research and Behavioural Science, 2019(3), 1-8. Doi.10. 1002/sres.2590.

Rukumba, S. (2022). Effect of reward system on telecommunication industry performance in Kenya. Journal of Human Resource and Leadership, 2(2), 19-26.

Sadoff, S., Metcalfe, R., and Bugess, S. (2021). Understanding the response to financial and non-financial incentives in education: Field experiment evidence using high –stakes assessments. Journal Homepage, 1-15

Sangoseni, O., Hellman, M., and Hill, C. (2012). Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess the effect of online learning on behaviours, attitudes and clinical practices of physical therapists in United States regarding evidence based practice. Journal of Allied Health Science Practice, 11, 1-12.

Schwab, J., and Somerville, L. H. (2022), Raising stakes for online learning: Monetary incentives increase performance in a computer-based leaning task under certain conditions. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(780301), 1-12.

Stosich, E. L., and Bristol, T. J. (2018). Advancing a New Focus on Teaching Quality: A Critical Synthesis. Stanford, CA: Stanford Centre for Opportunity Policy in Education.

Taherdoost, H. (2016). Validity and reliability of the research instruments. How to test the validation of a questionnaire or survey in a research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management, 5(3), 28-36.

Ukandu, V.O. (2022). Employee experiences of reward systems and work performance in undesirable locations. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Walden University

Wagner, V., Schildberg-Horisch, H. (2018). Monetary and non-monetary incentives for educational attainment: Design and effectiveness. Gutenberg school of Management and Economic and Research Unit. Interdisciplinary Public Policy. Discussion Paper Series No.1821.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-31

How to Cite

Ololo, T. O., Onditi, M. A., & Mwebi, B. (2024). The Effect of Principals’ Reward System on Learners’ Academic Performance in Kenya Certificate of Secondary Education. International Journal of Advances in Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(3), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.56225/ijassh.v3i3.300

Issue

Section

Articles