The Multi-Period Surgical Scheduling with Capacity Constraint: A Mathematical Modelling Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56225/ijgoia.v1i2.21Keywords:
mathematical model, surgical scheduling, multi-period, capacity constraint, minimizationAbstract
This research proposes a mathematical model for multi-period surgical scheduling problem with capacity constraint over a particular time horizon. The goal is to schedule a list of patients who must undergo various kinds of operations by different eligible hospitals. In particular, each operation must be performed in a particular time period and different operations of one patient can be performed by different eligible hospitals. In addition, each hospital has limited surgery capacity for each time period. The problem is formulated with a multi-objective model using the weighted sum approach of two objectives: minimization of makespan and minimization of total least preference assignment score. The experiment is executed using the simulated data according to the real treatments of cleft lip and palate patients. The results show that the model yield the correct assignment and operation sequence respected to all constraints. Thus, this proposed mathematical model can be further used as smart decision tool in surgical scheduling in hospital network.
References
Cardoen, B., Demeulemeester, E., & Beliën, J. (2010). Operating room planning and scheduling: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 201(3), 921–932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.04.011
Donahue, R., Russell, D., de Riese, C., Smith, C., de Riese, W. T. W., & Medway, A. (2017). Patients willing to wait: arrival time, wait time and patient satisfaction in an ambulatory urology clinic. Urology Practice, 4(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urpr.2016.02.003
Drupsteen, J., van der Vaart, T., & van Donk, D. P. (2013). Integrative practices in hospitals and their impact on patient flow. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 33(7), 912–933. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-12-2011-0487
Gartner, D., & Kolisch, R. (2014). Scheduling the hospital-wide flow of elective patients. European Journal of Operational Research, 233(3), 689–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.08.026
Hamid, M., Nasiri, M. M., Werner, F., Sheikhahmadi, F., & Zhalechian, M. (2019). Operating room scheduling by considering the decision-making styles of surgical team members: a comprehensive approach. Computers & Operations Research, 108, 166–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2019.04.010
Jebali, A., & Diabat, A. (2015). A stochastic model for operating room planning under capacity constraints. International Journal of Production Research, 53(24), 7252–7270. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1033500
Langer, E. J. (1977). The psychology of chance. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 7(2), 185–207.
May, J. H., Spangler, W. E., Strum, D. P., & Vargas, L. G. (2011). The surgical scheduling problem: Current research and future opportunities. Production and Operations Management, 20(3), 392–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2011.01221.x
Min, D., & Yih, Y. (2010). An elective surgery scheduling problem considering patient priority. Computers & Operations Research, 37(6), 1091–1099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2009.09.016
Roberts, C. T., Semb, G., & Shaw, W. C. (1991). Strategies for the advancement of surgical methods in cleft lip and palate. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 28(2), 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569_1991_028_0141_sftaos_2.3.co_2
Silva, T. A. O., & de Souza, M. C. (2020). Surgical scheduling under uncertainty by approximate dynamic programming. Omega, 95, 102066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2019.05.002
Testi, A., Tanfani, E., & Torre, G. (2007). A three-phase approach for operating theatre schedules. Health Care Management Science, 10(2), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-007-9011-1
Vissers, J. M. H., Adan, I. J. B. F., & Bekkers, J. A. (2005). Patient mix optimization in tactical cardiothoracic surgery planning: a case study. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, 16(3), 281–304. https://doi.org/10.1093/imaman/dpi023
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 by the authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright @2022. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.