A Study of Communication Behavior in Private Spaces and Anticipation: Role of Teachers Based Character Education and Digital Literacy

Dwi Aji Budiman; Rasianna Saragih; Yuliati Yuliati; Andy Makhrian

doi:10.56225/jmsc.v2i3.237

Authors

Dwi Aji Budiman Department of Communication, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Bengkulu, 38122 Kota Bengkulu, Bengkulu, Indonesia
Rasianna Saragih Department of Communication, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Bengkulu, 38122 Kota Bengkulu, Bengkulu, Indonesia
Yuliati Yuliati Department of Communication, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Bengkulu, 38122 Kota Bengkulu, Bengkulu, Indonesia
Andy Makhrian Department of Communication, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Bengkulu, 38122 Kota Bengkulu, Bengkulu, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56225/jmsc.v2i3.237

Keywords:

Symbolic violence, Character education, Digital literacy, Communication behavior

Abstract

This study aims to explain symbolic violence as a behavior of communicating among students, explain text signs and the context of symbolic violence based on the process of communication behavior among students and explain symbolic violence and anticipation of student behavior through the role of teachers based on character education and digital literacy. This research uses a qualitative approach. Data collection techniques use observation and documentation. Data analysis is done by organizing data, describing it into units, synthesizing, structuring it into patterns, choosing which ones are important and which ones to learn, and making conclusions. The results showed that acts of symbolic violence between students through private space communication were considered commonplace even though they realized that these actions were not justified. The violence is caused by feeling superior and thinking other students have shortcomings. In order to avoid symbolic acts of violence in the media, the role of the teacher in each teaching refers to character building. Digital literacy efforts are carried out in schools to shape character and anticipate violence for students when using digital media.

References

Aji, A. D., Sofyandi, H., Tarmidi, D., & Saefudin, N. (2019). The Effect of Self-Efficacy, Creativity, and Motivation on Entrepreneurship Interest in FBM Students of Widyatama University, Indonesia. Global Business & Management Research, 11(1), 87–95.

Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Harvard University Press.

Buchory, H. A. (2014). Analysis of the effect of capital, net interest margin, credit risk and profitability in the implementation of banking intermediation. European Journal of Business and Management, 6(24), 20–31.

Burawoy, M. (2019). Symbolic violence: conversations with Bourdieu. Duke University Press.

Gusnita, C. (2017). Kekerasan Simbolik Berita Kriminal di Media Massa. Deviance Jurnal Kriminologi, 1(1), 71–81.

Harefa, N., & Suyanti, R. D. (2019). Science generic skills of ‘chemistry’? prospective teachers: A study on collaborative learning using Exe-media. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1397(1), 12–32. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1397/1/012032

Kristiawan, M., Ahmad, S., Tobari, T., & Suhono, S. (2017). Desain Pembelajaran SMA Plus Negeri 2 Banyuasin III Berbasis Karakter Di Era Masyarakat Ekonomi ASEAN. Jurnal Iqra’: Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 2(2), 403–432.

Pribadi, F. (2016). Kekerasan Simbolik Media Massa (Kekerasan Simbolik dalam Pemberitaan Kasus Peredaran Video Asusila di Media Massa Online: Kajian Sosiologi Komunikasi). Jurnal Sosiologi Pendidikan Humanis, 1(2), 127–139. https://doi.org/10.17977/um021v1i22016p127

Putri, R. O. (2020). Kekerasan Simbolik (Studi Relasi Pendidik Dan Peserta Didik ). FITRAH:Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 5(1), 55–82. https://doi.org/10.24952/fitrah.v5i1.1332

Rachman, M. F., & Susan, N. (2021). Modal Sosial Masyarakat Digital dalam Diskursus Keamanan Siber. Jurnal Indonesia Maju, 1(1), 1–11.

Ria, M. D., & Budiman, A. (2021). Perancangan sistem informasi tata kelola teknologi informasi perpustakaan. Jurnal Informatika Dan Rekayasa Perangkat Lunak, 2(1), 122–133.

Sugiyono, P. D. (2018). Quantitative, qualitative, and R&D research methods. In Bandung:(Alfabeta, Ed.).

Triyanto, T. (2020). Peluang dan tantangan pendidikan karakter di era digital. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 17(2), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v17i2.35476