Contingent Valuation Analysis for Conservation of Fungi in Malaysia: Are You Willing to Pay?

Authors

  • Hafiz Rahman Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Development, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Malaysia
  • Mahirah Kamaludin Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Development, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56225/ijassh.v1i2.46

Keywords:

Contingent Valuation Method (CVM), Willingness to Pay (WTP), national park, conservation, fungi

Abstract

In a biological cycle on earth, there are components of life and the environment that interact with each other in carrying out functions to maintain the balance of life on earth. The function of each biotic and abiotic component that makes interactions in the ecosystem could even give a stable life cycle but deforestation that happened was not good for the surrounding, then how much it will cost to reforestation process. In conjunction with the present issue, this study is written to analyze the willingness to pay for the conservation of fungi in Malaysia. This study is designed using the Contingent Valuation Method (CVM). The results obtained after performing the double bond test also showed that the value obtained for the willingness to pay was approximately RM 4.10. In conclusion, this study indicated that the respondents are willing to make additional payments in order to restore the environment, especially the conservation of fungal communities in forest areas.

References

Brown Jr, G., & Mendelsohn, R. (1984). The hedonic travel cost method. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 427–433.

Cameron, T. A., & Quiggin, J. (1998). Estimation using contingent valuation data from a “dichotomous choice with follow-up” questionnaire: Reply. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 35(2), 195–199.

De Frutos, P., Martinez-Peña, F., Aldea, J., & Campos, P. (2016). A model to estimate willingness to pay for harvest permits for wild edible mushrooms: Application to Andalusian Forests. Forests, 7(12), 292.

Dwyer, J. F., Peterson, G. L., & Darragh, A. J. (1983). Estimating the value of urban forests using the travel cost method. Journal of Arboriculture, 9(7), 182–185.

Idris, M. A., & Dollard, M. F. (2014). Psychosocial safety climate, emotional demands, burnout, and depression: a longitudinal multilevel study in the Malaysian private sector. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19(3), 291.

Liu, J., Liu, N., Zhang, Y., Qu, Z., & Yu, J. (2019). Evaluation of the non-use value of beach tourism resources: A case study of Qingdao coastal scenic area, China. Ocean & Coastal Management, 168, 63–71.

Margulis, S. (1992). Back-of-the-envelope estimates of environmental damage costs in Mexico (Vol. 824). Country Department II Latin America and the Caribbean Regional Office

Portney, P. R. (1994). The contingent valuation debate: why economists should care. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(4), 3–17.

Singh, I. (2017). Antimicrobials in higher plants: classification, mode of action and bioactivities. Chem. Biol. Lett, 4(1), 48–62.

Tahir, A., Ahmad, R., & Kasirun, Z. M. (2010). Maintainability dynamic metrics data collection based on aspect-oriented technology. Malaysian Journal of Computer Science, 23(3), 177–194.

Whitman, W. (2008). The Concept of the Ecosystem. Published by the Regents of the University of Michigan, 456.

Zhang, K., Pu, Y.-Y., & Sun, D.-W. (2018). Recent advances in quality preservation of postharvest mushrooms (Agaricus bisporus): A review. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 78, 72–82.

Downloads

Published

2022-05-31

How to Cite

Rahman, H., & Kamaludin, M. (2022). Contingent Valuation Analysis for Conservation of Fungi in Malaysia: Are You Willing to Pay?. International Journal of Advances in Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(2), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.56225/ijassh.v1i2.46

Issue

Section

Articles
Abstract viewed = 121 times